Much like our current political “leadership”, Iranian leaders show no respect for their own people. [1] Iran is not even close to being there right now. My closest guess is that the most we can expect from Islamic Republic of Iran at this point in time is what happened in People's Republic of China after Tiananmen.[2] Iranians deserve their Freedom We ought to give them our support. At  least Obama should support Freedom, he is an imbecile if he thinks he can make points with Ahmadinejad.![3]

The Islamic Republic of Iran is bleeding now. Many young, innocent folks are being obliterated and we believe although the shedding blood is for Iran but the anguish will be for the whole Earth. [4] Iranian protesters must be reminded that the world is behind them and to keep up the fight. In the late 18th century, a different grouping of dissenters demonstrated against a government that endlessly went against the will of the people.[5] Iranians consider their support for a more democratic arrangement, with sane relations with the United States government, as at odds with their support for Ahmadinejad. They don't desire for him to continue his uncompromising policies.[6]

Islamic Republic of Iran, we are assured, is on the edge of, if not slipping at once into, pandemonium. Both sides of the presidential election have laid claim not only to victory but landslide victory, and as comes about in such cases in states that are not actual democracies, the nominee who is out of power has ostensibly found himself under apprehension, and the population is edging from edgy to volatile.[7] Persian women do enjoy prerogatives that adult females in a lot Arabian countries do not. But Islamic Republic of Iran powerful clerics acknowledge that democracy's advancement and the freeing of women go hand in hand.[8] Iranians now battle over which madman should be their president. As though one is any better than the other but still they demonstrate.[9]

Islamic Republic of Iran's leaderless (therefore doomed) uprising was not merely against an apparently rigged election, but against the organization, the mullocracy.  It will be worrying to see whether the Western commentary delineates the obvious conclusions: The Islamic Republic of Iran remains resolute on becoming a atomic armed power with annihilationist aspirations towards the State of Israel, with hegemonic aspirations in the Middle East by and large and with the continued will to fortify terror groups near and far.[11]

[1] http://scaredmonkeys.com/2009/06/29/obamas-kumbaya-foreign-policy-yet-another-disaster-ahmadinejad-accuses-obama-of-interference-when-barack-has-done-nothing/
[2] http://tominpaine.blogspot.com/2009/07/obama-played-for-fool-by-ahmadinejad.html
[3] http://spectator.org/archives/2009/06/16/interesting-times-in-tehran
[4] http://whereismyvotee.wordpress.com/2009/06/17/to-the-world-ask-where-our-votes-are/
[5] http://blog.americanhistorynow.org/2009/06/new-beginning-indeed.html
[6] http://sciencereligionnews.blogspot.com/2009/06/iranian-elections-is-internet-fooling.html
[7] http://wtfobama.net/2009/06/15/morning-briefing-for-june-15-2009/
[8] http://scathinglywrongrightwingnutz.blogspot.com/2009/06/rigged-election-in-iran-cheated-women.html
[9] http://www.faithfreedom.org/2009/06/19/iran-in-crisis-an-ayatollah-undone/
[10] http://www.juancole.com/2009/07/osc-israeli-rightwing-press-attacks.html
[11] http://www.robinshepherdonline.com/irans-rigged-election-astounds-analysts-but-will-the-world-draw-the-obvious-conclusion/